2.50
お疲れさまでした。

変拍子なのに小節線が4/4のままなので頭が追いつきませんでした。
制作お疲れ様でした。

（既に多くの人によってたかってつっこまれているのでそんなに残ってないですけど）ツッコミする場所が多くてニヤリとしました。
ウェブページの日本語は結構面白い翻訳になってしまっているので、
（Weblio translation）など機械翻訳使用であんまり力入れて訳してないよ〜と但し書きしたほうがいいです。
ダウンロードはnormalとanother分けてダウンロードさせてますが、本来１つにするべきです。

やっと曲ですが……叫び声と共に速度変化させるのはシュールです。
メロディは繋がりすぎてますし、譜面では長音以外のメロディを叩かせてくれません。
鍵盤のLNは複数音の長音ファイルを流すものではありません。
曲ジャンルはArtcore……、chiptune……、その２つではなさそうです。
（(c)haoseのような文字が浮かんできます）

（Weblio translation）
There were many places that performed a feed (though I do not stay so much anymore because it is plunged into many people all together) and grinned.
When power puts Japanese of the web page by machine translation use including (Weblio translation) in quite interesting translated one too much and does not translate it, but I write it and should do it.
I let the downloading distributes normal and another and download it, but should originally make one.

At last it is music……It is surreal to change speed with a cry.
The melody is connected too much and does not let you criticize the melody except the long sound in the sheet of music.
Plural LN of the keyboard are not things draining the long sound file of the sound.
Artcore……chiptune……It does not seem to be two.
(a letter such as (c)haose floats)

ヤバい！！！！！！！！！！！！！

ヤバいわよ！！！！！！！！！！！！！

・Music(390点)
ジャンル的にはチップチューンの印象が強いです！
異色すぎるのとひたすらシンセが主張しすぎで、アートコア要素は感じませんでした…
ほぼ8分のみメロディでリズムが同じなためキャッチーさは生まれていないと思いう…

・Art(280点)
SABER WING要素は構成だけは感じましたね！
宇宙っぽい世界観が元曲のイメージと合致している気がして
コンセプトを貫いている印象でした！楽曲的には別の曲のように聴こえます。

・Obj(250点)
ギミックなども要素はDDRをイメージしたという
実際に演奏で説得力を感じた配置でした！
ひたすら縦連＋LN＋ゴミ的キック配置ってのは個性があった。
譜面が一つしか無いので、N,H,Aを用意しましょう！

BOFXV、制作お疲れさまでした！

ロングインプレありがとうございます! ;D

While this isn't a work I would put on par with most others,
I think this is a giant improvement from Dragon Etude! So before anything else I would like to genuinely commend you for your efforts. They're starting to pay.

Regarding the song,
From a composition point of view, you've managed to grasp the idea of consonance and dissonance, which is very important.
That said I still think there's a lot of room for improvement; many of the melodies you have are somewhat complex and unorthodox which makes it hard to feel really "gripped". I think studying certain concepts. You might be inclined to think that you might not "need" these concepts if you want to put them aside and make something unique/experimental, but I kind of want to argue that if you want to break fundamentals, it's important to be acquainted with them in order to understand how to substitute what they provide to a song.
Regarding the arrangement and sound choices, I think it is as a whole pretty interesting and decently cohesive, though a lot of instruments feel very "static" due to a lack of modulations in my opinion. Volumes in particular

The chart... is a very pleasant surprise. I genuinely enjoy playing it! Excepted for the last 30 measures or so.
The idea or execution aren't really at fault as much as how "redundant" it feels, I think. Past the first 16 measures or so, I found myself wanting a different approach to charting the sounds presents at the moment.
Again though, I think you should look into making more charts. Note, however that it doesn't mean that you should redo all your keysounds.
In fact I would suggest that you study other BMSes and see how keysounds and charts are organized: for 99% of cases charts share the same keysounds and are all grouped in the same folder.

At the rate things are going, you're definitely on your way to becoming a promising BMS author. Much like last time, you'll find improvement naturally by just making more and more music and charts, so you have my personal encouragements to keep at it and come again.
If you want to study chartmaking on its own, I would personally recommend making "sabuns", that is, charts of other people's music so that you expose yourself to different perspectives of it. In fact, it could also be a great source of inspiration music-wise, to see how people fill space in their songs and break down their music into individual elements.